BOULDER DAILY CAMERA:
City Council candidate Fenno Hoffman wants Boulder to take on density
Architect says region has borne the brunt of city's rules
By Erica Meltzer Camera Staff Writer, Posted: 10/01/2009 11:21:40 PM MDT
Like so many East Coast refugees who have wandered into Boulder, Fenno Hoffman fell in love with the place, with the people and with the mountain views. After going to graduate school at the University of Colorado and living in Italy, he came back to work as an architect and consultant and to raise his children here. But the sprawl that has grown up around Boulder has taken some of the sheen off the mountain views, Hoffman said.
He's running for the Boulder City Council because he wants the city to take responsibility for the impact its growth restrictions have had on the region. He wants the city to adopt policies -- including increased density -- that allow Boulder residents to spend less time in their cars and more people who work in Boulder to live here, too.
"Boulder is exporting the impact of its mountain views and easy motoring into our neighboring communities' backyards," he said.
Hoffman said his views on urban planning have evolved, influenced both by the growth of the surrounding region since he moved to Boulder in 1983 ("There was no Erie -- it was a tiny town with dirt roads") and by his trips to Europe and China ("Whenever I left the United States, I hardly ever drove anywhere").
He wants the city to take a hard look at its land-use planning to allow more people to live here and encourage businesses to stay. He called the city's Climate Action Plan "lipstick on a pig" that will not reduce the city's carbon footprint as long as thousands of people are forced to commute long distances every day.
"We need every neighborhood to be walkable, and we need every neighborhood to have a variety of housing types," he said. "I want to put a price on mountain views. What are they costing us in terms of sustainability and affordability?"
The first step is to come up with a vision, then "reverse-engineer" the policies that will produce the desired result, he said. After years of working 12- and 14-hour days, Hoffman has scaled back his work at his architecture firm and on local boards. He said he decided to run because he thinks he can fill a void on a council whose members sometimes spend too much time on the trees and miss the forest.
Mollie Fager, who worked with Hoffman when she was executive director of the Dairy Center for the Arts and he was a board member, said she is "delighted" he's running for the council. She said his ability to step back was evident when the board worked on strategic planning for the arts center.
"He was so good at defining what the vision is and then asking how we get there," she said. "It's so easy to dive into the details and the minutia before you know where you really want to go." Whether Hoffman's vision for Boulder matches that of voters remains to be seen.
When proposals for higher-density projects come up, neighbors often object. PLAN-Boulder County, an environmental group that wants Boulder County to remain rural and scenic, declined to endorse Hoffman. Pat Shank, one of the group's co-chairs, said there was concern that Hoffman's views on planning were too pro-growth, though he stressed that he was speaking for himself and not on behalf of the board.
"He uses the term 'repair sprawl' quite a bit," Shank said. "To an extent, we agree with him that Boulder will continue to grow. But many, many people in Boulder have said, over and over again, they don't want Boulder to get much bigger. Adding density has its advantages, but Boulder already is the third-densest city in Colorado."
Despite his passion on the issue, Hoffman said he'll be pragmatic and listen to all sides. "It's not about bringing an agenda to the council," he said. "It's about daylighting the choices we have."
BOULDER WEEKLY: Interview with the Boulder Weekly (9.30.09)
1. How should the council balance the rights of private property owners with the council's ability to implement zoning and other regulations that reflect the community's values on growth, development and density?
In a nutshell, I think Boulder spends too much time worrying about our own backyards and not enough time thinking about the impacts of our values upon the broader region and the planet. We are going broke and our carbon footprint is ABOVE the national average. That’s a pathetic fact for a town that considers itself as Green as we do. It doesn’t have to be this way. Boulder needs to get real.
Zoning codes are supposed to balance private property rights and community values. Boulder is constantly fiddling with these codes to adjust the balance. We have plenty of fears about what we don’t want to see in Boulder, and those fears often drive the debate, resulting in contentious and complicated micromanagement. There is a lot of scientific literature that examines the impact of the powerful forces of growth, development and density upon local and regional change, and we need this research to inform our community about the effects of our values upon real world problems like affordable housing, suburban sprawl, climate change, economic competition and community. If Boulder closes its doors to all new development, we effectively export our own working citizens into our neighboring city’s backyards. We preserve our mountain views and small town character--which we all love--but we aren’t being accountable for the consequences of our actions. The balancing act of values and rights needs to include a regional perspective. And in fact, if you consider climate change important, as I do, then our discussions must include a global perspective too.
2. Do you believe medicinal marijuana dispensaries should be banned in the city? Why or why not?
No. People putting peanut butter on Doritos, giggling excessively or engaging in circular philosophical debates doesn’t constitute a problem that’s on my radar right now. We have bigger fish to fry.
3. In managing the city's public lands, there seems to be a tension between preservation and recreation. If city planners must err on one side or the other, which way do you believe they should lean as the West TSA process moves forward?
I don’t think we should lean to one direction or the other. These are both strongly held values, and right now, they’re in balance.
4. Which do you see as a higher priority right now: environmental efforts, affordable housing or the city's financial stability? Why?
Financial stability. We can’t pay for anything-—the environment, low-income housing, schools-—if the budget is busted. Once our financial house is in order, however, I think that environmental efforts and affordable housing are two sides of the same coin. By increasing density, we lower our carbon footprint, create communities that are walkable, safe and friendly, and increase the opportunity for the people who work in Boulder to live in Boulder. Density will impact and affect the shape of our community—and impact everything—but what we’re doing now is impacting everything as well. We’re just exporting those impacts to our neighbor’s backyards. We need to consider the PER CAPITA impacts of our actions regionally. This is the only responsible thing to do.
5. What would you do if you found a prairie dog burrowing in your backyard?
I’d take a picture. My family might give the prairie dog a name (Bob? Jim? Sheila?), document his/her exploits for our annual Christmas card, or observe said dog’s doings for a real-world life-science lesson. If the prairie dog ultimately just couldn’t resist my wife’s prize roses or my kid’s toys, would I consider calling someone to move him? Sure. But that’s not the first step I would take. Co-existence is important. But, the roses have rights too…oh this is complicated and could take years to resolve...
BOULDER DAILY CAMERA: Five for City Council: We endorse mix of newcomers, incumbents.
By Erika Stutzman Posted: 10/11/2009 01:00:00 AM MDT
Some of the city issues our City Council has approached with thoughtfulness and created laws to govern -- including city schools redevelopment, the Robb's Music project, major new housing complexes and compatible development -- have illustrated a marked divide on the council.
We don't expect that to change, but we did see this election as an opportunity to look at the council as a whole unit, including those members who remain seated, to select five candidates who represent a broader spectrum of our residents' philosophies for City Council.
Suzy Ageton handily wins our endorsement for re-election. She is independent and fair-minded legislator. She is able to see all sides of an issue before making a decision.
Mayor Matthew Appelbaum has a careful eye for details in tough ordinances, and we consider him willing to compromise and accept change -- he's the first one to say he is eager to review decisions over time to see if they're working, how they're working, and whether they can work better.
To call George Karakehian a "newcomer" sounds almost silly after his decades of being a business owner on Pearl Street and serving on boards ranging from Chautauqua, to Downtown Boulder Inc., to Hospice and the visitor's bureau. Karakehian will be an asset when dealing with budget decisions, relationships with businesses and the university, and championing the services that make our city great.
KC Becker is whip smart, and as a young mother understands the needs of young, growing families in Boulder. Her experience with the Sierra Club, environmental issues and public land laws make her a natural fit for the City Council.
Fenno Hoffman's ideas about smart growth and urban development won't win over the entire council every time, but do present both a good balance and compelling views about current and future trends, and how they may impact our entire region, including surrounding towns. His background as an architect and urban planner will serve the city well. His campaign started late; we urge our readers to give him serious consideration.
Barry Siff is the strongest of the candidates we are not endorsing this year, though we could see him as a good fit with the council. An experienced businessman with a deep knowledge of environmental concerns and recreation -- critical issues in Boulder -- Siff is smart, dedicated and has an earnest willingness to work with the Hill and the university to improve relationships between our various institutions and the city.
We did not choose to endorse incumbent Macon Cowles this year. We found him to be particularly tone-deaf to his constituents -- who include those who agree and disagree with him -- particularly on the compatible development issue. Several candidates pointed out that at the end of even very heated arguments over new ordinances or changes to the law, we're all still neighbors. Cowles attitude seemed, to us, to be that Boulderites who don't like council decisions can leave the city. That's not the kind of leadership Boulder needs as it faces tough decisions about our future.
Other candidates include: Jyotsna Raj, Kevin Hotaling, Rob Smoke, Seth Brigham, Tim Plass and Valerie Mitchell. Plass and Mitchell have great energy and great ideas, but when we were considering the overall mix of currently seated and potential future members -- and their leanings on issues of business development, the environment, home ownership, neighborhoods, budget needs and future growth -- we think they may be better suited to continue to serve the city in other ways, or in a future election year.
Please see today's Voter's Guide for more information about local races and ballot issues.
-- Erika Stutzman, for
the Camera editorial board
|